Amd Ryzen 7 5700g Vs 3700x
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs Ryzen 7 5700G
Price now 310$
Games supported 100%
Price now 490$
Games supported 100%
General info
Comparing Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen seven 5700G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales showtime time and price.
| Identify in functioning rating | 242 | 201 |
| Value for money | 53.86 | 38.30 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Serial | AMD Ryzen vii | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Cezanne (2021−2022) |
| Release engagement | 27 May 2019 (3 years ago) | 13 Apr 2021 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $359 |
| Price at present | $310 (0.9x MSRP) | $490 (one.4x MSRP) |
Value for money
To go the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their toll, taking into account the price of other processors.
Technical specs
Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen seven 5700G bones parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo heave clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment yous take to consider their examination results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Cadre) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | xvi | 16 |
| Base of operations clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | iv.6 GHz |
| L1 enshroud | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| L3 enshroud | 32 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | vii nm, 12 nm | no data |
| Die size | no data | AM4 (1331) mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 one thousand thousand | no data |
| 64 bit back up | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | no information |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen vii 3700X and Ryzen 7 5700G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit of measurement (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to melody the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | no information |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported past Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 5700G. You'll probably demand this information if yous crave some particular technology.
| Instruction ready extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost ii, XFR 2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen seven 5700G are enumerated here.
Retention specs
Types, maximum corporeality and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen vii 5700G. Depending on the motherboards, college memory frequencies may exist supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum retentivity size | 128 GB | no information |
| Max retentivity channels | ii | no information |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | 51.196 GB/south |
| ECC memory back up | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | - |
Benchmark performance
Diverse benchmark results of the processors in comparing. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, college is better.
Overall score
This is our combined criterion operation rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments department, we usually fix problems chop-chop.
- Passmark
- GeekBench five Single-Core
- GeekBench five Multi-Cadre
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-flake multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- wPrime 32
- Cinebench xi.5 64-bit multi-cadre
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 11.v 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench xv 64-scrap single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- WinRAR 4.0
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of viii different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics adding. In that location is also 1 split single-threaded scenario measuring unmarried-cadre performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Cinebench R10 is an aboriginal ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses simply one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of offset 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Criterion coverage: 18%
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Cinebench R11.5 is an sometime benchmark past Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Information technology was superseded by subsequently versions of Cinebench, which use more modernistic variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a unmarried thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room total of crystal spheres and low-cal sources.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release xv) is a benchmark fabricated by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Information technology was superseded by afterward versions of Cinebench, which use more mod variants of Movie theatre 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Unmarried-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to return a room full of cogitating spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: thirteen%
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-wing-encryption of disk partitions, at present superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, ane of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Event is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: xiii%
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. Information technology contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
x264 Laissez passer ii is a slower variant of x264 video pinch that produces a variable fleck rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when information technology is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Criterion coverage: 12%
x264 version iv.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to shrink a sample Hard disk (720p) video. Pass i is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per 2nd, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per 2nd.
Criterion coverage: 12%
Gaming functioning
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 21.93 | 23.72 |
| Novelty | 27 May 2019 | 13 Apr 2021 |
| Cost | $329 | $359 |
| Boost clock speed | 4400 | 4600 |
| Base clock speed | 3600 | 3800 |
Technical City couldn't decide between
AMD Ryzen seven 3700X
and
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
The differences in functioning seem too small.
Should yous nonetheless have questions on pick between Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen seven 5700G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your vote
Do yous think nosotros are correct or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" push button near your favourite CPU.
Competitors of Ryzen 7 3700X by Intel
Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen vii 3700X from Intel is Core i9-10900X, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Hither are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen vii 3700X:
Competitors of Ryzen 7 5700G past Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 7 5700G from Intel is Core i7-11700K, which is about equal in speed and college by 3 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 7 5700G:
Like processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and functioning relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
User rating
Hither you can see how users rate the processors, likewise as rate them yourself.
Rate AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on a scale of 1 to v:
Rate AMD Ryzen seven 5700G on a scale of i to v:
Questions and comments
Hither you tin can enquire a question nigh Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 7 5700G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/cpu/Ryzen-7-3700X-vs-Ryzen-7-5700G
0 Response to "Amd Ryzen 7 5700g Vs 3700x"
Post a Comment